>>> Lars Marowsky-Bree <[email protected]> schrieb am 22.04.2013 um 13:14 in >>> Nachricht <[email protected]>: > On 2013-04-22T12:13:50, Ulrich Windl <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > In that thread I can see that cLVM does not support snapshot. There is > > Oops! I didn't know that. Maybe be cLVM (Clustered LVM) should be renamed > to > > lLVM (less LVM)... ;-) > > cLVM2 doesn't support snapshots because the snapshot format is not > well-suited to cluster-wide locking. Making local-exclusive LVs > snapshottable would be somewhat easier. > > Why are you using Linux if you hate it so much? It seems you don't like > *anything* about it.
Hi! There's nothing wrong with Linux; I only have a problem if products of "beta" quality are shipped as enterprise solutions. Enterprise customers want to USE the software, not debug it... To make things worse, a common answer you get from support the is: "it's not our software, we can only report the problem upstream" That's the problem with spare-time open-source programmers: They only fix their software to make their hardware work, fixing their problems. That's valid also, but if a company ships such software and offers support, those companies should also have at least one paid developer per critical component, so that problems can be actively fixed (as opposed to: waiting for a solution from elsewhere). Or as I put it: Even open-source programmers want a roof above their head and something to bite at the end of the day. Someone else used the phrase "green banana" for SLES11. Regards, Ulrich _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
