>>> Lars Marowsky-Bree <[email protected]> schrieb am 19.04.2013 um 10:22 in >>> Nachricht <[email protected]>: > On 2013-04-19T09:56:37, Ulrich Windl <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > sbd monitoring went crazy (reporting running sbds when there were none, > compaining the unability to stop sbd when there was none), so I stopped it. > > What did you monitor? And what do you mean by "went crazy"? > > (Besides, monitoring sbd is unnecessary anyway.)
Amazingly it depends on what support person you talk to: I disabled it for one, and the other complained we disabled it. > > > Now that I re-activated it, the cluster talks about resources that had been > deleted days ago, like: > > Hm, is this creating an actual problem? The status section may have > records about orphan resources, but that should be harmless. (I think a > recent change made this better, too.) I just try to understand what is going on in out cluster... Yes, the next version is always the best, so don't use this version ;-) Regards, Ulrich _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
