>>> Lars Marowsky-Bree <[email protected]> schrieb am 06.02.2013 um 09:26 in >>> Nachricht <[email protected]>: > On 2013-02-06T09:19:58, Ulrich Windl <[email protected]> > wrote: > > (The "L" button in mutt. I need to make better use of that ;-) > > > Let me remark that the "brief window" is long enough for a user to start > crm_mon after cleanup a few times and still see "Stopped" resources. Maybe > it's more obvious for non-trivial setups. > > Yes, they can see that (depending on how long the probe takes). It's the > kind of thing that isn't obvious to people who're familiar with the > stack - "Yeah, well, I typed cleanup and the UI briefly reflects this > state". But it should be possible to improve. > > > I also wondered (without hard evidence of a problem) whether the cluster > can handle interleaved sequences of resource cleanups (using individual > resource anmes and nod enames) and the probes induced by cleanup (as you > stated). I ha dthe impression that the cluster is more stable if you wait > significant time between individual cleanups. > > It should be able to handle that. > > What does "unstable" mean?
I cannot remember well, but when using groups, I had the impression that groups stopped/started more often than actually necessary. > > > Regards, > Lars _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
