Ah, ok. Florian. Thanks! :)
On 3 January 2013 08:30, Florian Crouzat <[email protected]> wrote: > Le 31/12/2012 12:41, Jose Baez a écrit : > > Hi! > > > > I have been looking around and haven't seen if this scenario is possible: > > > > 1.) Server-1 with two virtual/floating IP's. > > > > 2.) Each Virtual IP is linked to a process. Process X sends/receives from > > Virtual IP-1 and Process Y sends/receives from Virtual IP-2 > > > > 3.) If one process dies, HB would take its virtualIP down and tells > > Server-2 to activate that Virtual IP and start exclusively that process. > > > > If this is possible, could you tell me where I can find info/example on > how > > to achieve this? > > > > Of course it is possible, and it's a very common setup. > You have to create two groups: > * VIP1+PX > * VIP2+PY > If I understand correctly, when both nodes are available you want node1 > to host everything: you have to define a location constraint with a > score of N such as 0 < N < +INF (which means: "advisory" and not > mandatory). > > Btw, a group is a syntaxic shortcut for collocation + ordering so it > will achieve what you want (you just have to configure a monitor > operation on your services). > > You can find all these in Pacemaker Explained / Cluster from Scratch. > > -- > Cheers, > Florian Crouzat > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
