On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:11 AM, Robinson, Eric <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> > > Basically you're hitting a bug in 1.1.8 I made the "is node >> > X alive?" >> > > check much stricter but there are certain timing windows >> > which produce >> > > a false positive. >> > > >> > > You should be fine after applying the following two patches (or >> > > building from HEAD): >> > > >> > > + Andrew Beekhof (4 weeks ago) b87494d: High: legacy: Skip peer >> > > process check if the process list is empty in >> > > crm_is_corosync_peer_active() >> > > + Andrew Beekhof (4 weeks ago) 90fb225: High: legacy: Relax the >> > > 'active' check for plugin based clusters to avoid false negatives >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > Hi Andrew -- > > I tried to build 1.1.8-237 and ran into too many dependency problems. I > uninstalled everything and reinstalled using version 1.1.7 rpms, and now I > finally get the expected... > > ============ > Last updated: Mon Nov 5 09:08:04 2012 > Last change: Mon Nov 5 09:07:55 2012 via crmd on ha09a.mycharts.md > Stack: openais > Current DC: ha09a.mycharts.md - partition with quorum > Version: 1.1.7-6.el6-148fccfd5985c5590cc601123c6c16e966b85d14 > 2 Nodes configured, 2 expected votes > 0 Resources configured. > ============ > > Online: [ ha09b.mycharts.md ha09a.mycharts.md ] > > > Do you think it would be fine to proceed with Pacemaker 1.1.7?
Its not ideal. I'll build an updated set of RHEL6 packages that contains the relevant patches. Note that the plugin is being removed from the official RHEL packages. _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
