El 2012-10-30 02:53, Andrew Beekhof escribió: > I replied to the equivalent thread on the Pacemaker list. Sorry for posting on both lists! > For completeness, I also posted a slightly edited reply to: http://theclusterguy.clusterlabs.org/post/34604901720/pacemaker-and-cluster-filesystems
Nice, very clarifying. Specially, this conclusion is what I wanted to hear: > If you’re a SLES customer looking to use OCFS2, absolutely take the > Option 1 route. > For everyone else, although Option 3 is architecturally superior, > Option 2 is likely to be the safest approach for the next couple of > years. Thanks! _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
