Hi I'm a little bit confused about stack choices :
On this page we can see that there were 4 Corosync-based options : http://theclusterguy.clusterlabs.org/post/907043024/introducing-the-pacemaker-master-control-process-for So, starting with 1.1.3, the following Corosync-based options are possible: 1. corosync + pacemaker plugin (v0) 2. corosync + pacemaker plugin (v1) + mcp 3. corosync + cpg + cman + mcp 4. corosync + cpg + quorumd + mcp But on the other side, RH recommendation for stack under pacemaker is only to put cman, so instead of corosync layer (+cpg ?) and recommend to follow this procedure : http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.1/html/Clusters_from_Scratch/ch08.html as RH will no more provide the corosync layer. So I'm a little bit confused : -does that mean that the future definitive stack is now Pacemaker/cman (without anything else like cpg and/or quorumd) ? -does that mean that it will be this Pacemaker/cman on RH ans SLES ? -or do RH and SLES wil require a different stack under Pacemaker ? Thanks a lot for your response. Regards Alain _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
