On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 08:28:24AM +0100, Ulrich Windl wrote: > >>> Dejan Muhamedagic <[email protected]> schrieb am 13.12.2011 um 17:02 in > Nachricht <20111213160251.GF3568@squib>: > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:33:27AM +0100, Ulrich Windl wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > As nobody answered (FAIR), I'm replying to my own message: As it turned > > out, there's a comment somewhere in the LRM sources that states "this part > > isn't implemented yet". > > > > Where? > > pengine/allocate.c:306-328 (I guess)
OK. That's not LRM, but CRM/PE. Thanks, Dejan > > > Once it is implemented (maybe even before), the CRM shell could benefit > > from a "crm resource reload .." (currently there's only a "restart" > > available). > > > > Hmm, not sure what does LRM has to do with the reload. It's just > > another operation. > > Jes, "another" operation probably means "not the same as restart". As said > earlier, > > when reloading one resource, a dependent resource is restarted, even if it > can be reloaded. Meaning: A "reload" means the resource is still up during > reload, thus no restarts or reloads of dependent resources should be > necessary. Things like that. > > Regards, > Ulrich > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Dejan > > > > > Regards, > > > Ulrich > > > > > > > > > >>> Ulrich Windl schrieb am 02.12.2011 um 10:17 in Nachricht > > > >>> <4ED89791.99F : > > 161 : > > > 60728>: > > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > After the preceeding discussion about the "reload" action I added a > > "reload" > > > > to my RA. > > > > Now I have another problem: Assume the configuration > > > > > > > > group G A B > > > > > > > > Both A, and B are the same RA that support reload. If I change the > > > > configuration of A, CRM stops B first, the reloads A, then starts B > > > > again. > > > > > > > > This makes me wonder what the reasoning for "reload" is at all. In > > > > normal > > > > cases, a reload avoids a restart of a resource. So if A isn't > > > > restartet, > > why > > > > is B then? > > > > > > > > I was hoping: if A can be reloaded, B can stay up. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Ulrich > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Linux-HA mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > > > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux-HA mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
