On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 4:59 PM, RaSca <[email protected]> wrote: > Il giorno Mar 20 Set 2011 17:54:58 CEST, Dejan Muhamedagic ha scritto: > [...] >>> And I completely agree with this, but in an environment like mine, where >>> a single resource failure might involve all the others (with fence) is >>> wronk to keep this kind of settings. Do you agree with me? >> No. If the resource cannot stop, then something's wrong either >> with the resource or with the RA. And needs to be fixed. > > And this is for sure. But I cannot make all resources on a node stop and > migrate (because of fence) just because one of them has failed. > Those resources are not connected one to each other, so it is more > reasonable to keep the survived resources alive, or at least live > migrating them (on-fail=standby) to the other node and THEN reboot the > first one. > > [...] >> If a resource fails to stop, then on-fail="stop" cannot possibly >> help. Furthermore, you basically make this resource less >> available (the cluster won't try to recover it). Must be that >> I'm missing something. >> At any rate, I don't think that you need to fiddle with the >> on-fail attribute, but see what's wrong with the RA or libvirt >> or the combination of the two. >> Thanks, >> Dejan > > Then my question is why the attribute on-fail was created? I repeat, I > totally agree with the fact that there are some problems with the RA but > until I find out exactly what's wrong I had to take care of all my > cluster's resources and so the most reasonable thing is to keep one > single failed vm stopped.
you probably want on-fail=block or on-fail=ignore until you figure out the problem. > > Thanks, > > -- > RaSca > Mia Mamma Usa Linux: Niente รจ impossibile da capire, se lo spieghi bene! > [email protected] > http://www.miamammausalinux.org > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
