On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Serge Dubrouski <[email protected]> wrote:
> Taking into account "simple" the answer is no. You can try RedHat
> Cluster Suite on CentOS, but that's not simple.
>
> What's wrong with DRBD/Pacemaker/Corosync ?

DRBD/Pacemaker was complicated, documentation did not exist or did not
match the behavior, the GUI was broken and never really worked. Config
files were completely opaque. I spent weeks on this without having
something that could work and was documentable.

Then I got the DRBD/heartbeat to work without Pacemaker, however, its
reliability leaves much to be desired. For example, if both systems
come up at the same time, they cannot decide who gets the resource. I
did a hack to fix that (restarting heartbeat after boot of one of the
systems) but that did not leave me with a warm and comfortable
feeling.

Then once in a while DRBD would stop syncing.

I need to replace our old, aging corporate DRBD/Heartbeat network
storage implementation, which always worked, but the servers are now
getting old. I am feeling very uncomfortable about using what I have
for replacement.

i


> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Igor Chudov <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I am interested in finding out Open Source alternative that would
>> replace both DRBD as well as Heartbeat. I am definitely NOT looking
>> for pacemaker either.
>>
>> I am looking for something simple, just file serving ability and
>> switching NFS and samba would be all I need.
>>
>> igor
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Serge Dubrouski <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> The question is too broad. Are you interested in Open Source or
>>> proprietary product? What do you want to achieve?
>>>
>>> One of the answers could be AoE (ATA over Ethernet) + OCFS2.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Igor Chudov <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> I would like to know if there are relatively straightforward Linux
>>>> based alternatives to DRBD and heartbeat.
>>>>
>>>> Any pointers and suggestions will be gratefully accepted.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> i
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Linux-HA mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
>>>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Serge Dubrouski.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Linux-HA mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
>>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux-HA mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Serge Dubrouski.
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to