On Oct 24, 2010, at 4:09 PM, Robinson, Eric wrote: > >>> But now could someone please elaborate on Dejan Muhamedagic's > original >>> comment that started the thread? What does "redundant rings are still > >>> not there" mean? Is a three-node cluster an unreliable setup because >>> Corosync and/or Pacemaker are not really ready for that? >>> > >> not Pacemaker - Corosync. I agree with Dejan. I also use Heartbeat for > clusters communication layer. > > So you use Heartbeat+Pacemaker instead of Corosync+Pacemaker? How does > Heartbeat handle 3-node clusters? Does it use the same "ring" metaphor > and switches for cluster communication? >
Heartbeat uses term "communication path", instead. And yes it has been able to support more then two node cluster since version 2. Take a look at http://oss.linbit.com/drbd-mc/ It's a nifty java application which can help you to create your initial cluster configuration in no time. Vadym _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
