On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Robinson, Eric <[email protected]> wrote: >> Then I'm missing the structure of your cluster Are you >> building one cluster that Includes 3 nodes? If yes then >> you need those nodes to be connected to all 3 rings. >> Are you building 3 clusters: one with 3 nodes and 2 more >> with 2 nodes each? If yes than why it has to be that >> complicated? > > I am building a 3-node cluster and adding it to a network that already > had a separate 2-node cluster. > > The new 3-node cluster would have 2 nodes actively serving up resources > with 1 node acting as a failover for both of the active nodes.
In this case all 3 nodes have to be connected to all rings if you want to use those rings for Pacemaker communications. And those rings have to be separate from existing cluster rings. > > -- > Eric Robinson > > > Disclaimer - October 22, 2010 > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended > solely for General Linux-HA mailing list. If you are not the named addressee > you should not disseminate, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views > or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and might > not represent those of Physicians' Managed Care or Physician Select > Management. Warning: Although Physicians' Managed Care or Physician Select > Management has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present > in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or > damage arising from the use of this email or attachments. > This disclaimer was added by Policy Patrol: http://www.policypatrol.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > -- Serge Dubrouski. _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
