On 8/11/2010 5:13 PM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 August 2010 17:04, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On 8/11/2010 4:23 PM, Igor Chudov wrote:
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> Well, that's kinda why I stick to 2.1.4 (also b/c it's a stock rpm on
>>>> centos) and v1-style config. From back when things were simple stupid.
>>>
>>> Simple stupid is exactly what I want.
>>
>> So is it not practical to run RHEL or CentOS 5.x where you'd get this
>> version and several more years of disto maintenance?
>
> It's not practical if you want to have both distro maintenance or cluster
> support. Ask for help w/ 2.1.4 here results in "that version of heartbeat 's
> been obsolete for years, upgrade to the latest" every time.
Yes, but if what he wants to do works under the 2.1.4 version as
(probably) patched by Red Hat there would be no need to ask for help
here for the next several years. That's why there are 'enterprise'
style distos that try not to change functionality over their long lives.
He's not really asking for extra features.
--
Les Mikesell
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
