On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 9:30 PM, Florian Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > On 05/04/2010 07:30 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: >> On 2010-04-25T11:39:10, Smaïne Kahlouch <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Do we have to move from Heartbeat to OpenAIS ? Now or in the future ? >>> What are the differences between these two project ? >>> Will the project heartbeat continue or will be replaced by >>> OpenAIS/Corosync. >> >> In addition to what Florian has explained, it is fair to point out that >> both SLES, openSUSE, RHEL (fedora?) have made the choice to only support >> openAIS/Corosync, and not heartbeat. > > Fedora actually has both.
For now. > And to complete the picture, Ubuntu 10.04 LTS > supports both, Debian squeeze most likely will too. > >> My guess would also be that the majority of testing today happens on top >> of corosync/openAIS by far. About the only time I start heartbeat is for a few days before a release. And even then only for 1.0 releases, 1.1 is only tested against corosync. > Probably true, though the amount of testing LINBIT does on both > messaging layers is quite substantial. Any chance I could convince LINBIT to do the heartbeat testing as an "official" part of the process for 1.0 releases? That would certainly be a big help. _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
