I found additionally the error message attached below. Please advise. Thanks Jarek
pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:47:15 debug: stand_alone_ping: Node 3.27.60.1 is alive pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:47:15 debug: debug2: ping_close: Closed connection to 3.27.60.1 pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:47:15 debug: send_update: Sent update: pingd=1000 (1 active ping nodes) pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:47:16 debug: debug2: stand_alone_ping: Checking connectivity pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:47:16 debug: debug2: ping_open: Got address 3.27.60.1 for 3.27.60.1 pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:47:16 debug: debug2: ping_open: Opened connection to 3.27.60.1 pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:47:16 debug: debug2: ping_write: Sent 39 bytes to 3.27.60.1 pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:47:16 debug: debug2: ping_read: Got 59 bytes No error message: -1: Resource temporarily unavailable (11) pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:47:16 debug: process_icmp_error: No error message: -1: Resource temporarily unavailable (11) pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:47:16 debug: debug2: dump_v4_echo: Echo from 3.27.60.1 (exp=1238, seq=18367, id=11669, dest=3. 27.60.1, data=pingd-v4): Echo Reply pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:47:16 info: stand_alone_ping: Node 3.27.60.1 is unreachable (read) pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:47:17 debug: debug2: ping_write: Sent 39 bytes to 3.27.60.1 pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:47:17 debug: debug2: ping_read: Got 59 bytes No error message: -1: Resource temporarily unavailable (11) pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:47:17 debug: process_icmp_error: No error message: -1: Resource temporarily unavailable (11) pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:47:17 debug: debug2: dump_v4_echo: Echo from 3.27.60.1 (exp=1239, seq=1238, id=6890, dest=3.27 .60.1, data=pingd-v4): Echo Reply pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:47:17 info: stand_alone_ping: Node 3.27.60.1 is unreachable (read) pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:47:18 debug: debug2: ping_close: Closed connection to 3.27.60.1 pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:47:18 debug: send_update: Sent update: pingd=0 (0 active ping nodes) pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:47:18 debug: debug2: stand_alone_ping: Checking connectivity pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:47:18 debug: debug2: ping_open: Got address 3.27.60.1 for 3.27.60.1 pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:47:18 debug: debug2: ping_open: Opened connection to 3.27.60.1 pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:47:18 debug: debug2: ping_write: Sent 39 bytes to 3.27.60.1 pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:47:18 debug: debug2: ping_read: Got 59 bytes pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:47:18 debug: debug2: dump_v4_echo: Echo from 3.27.60.1 (exp=1240, seq=1240, id=6890, dest=3.27 .60.1, data=pingd-v4): Echo Reply pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:47:18 debug: stand_alone_ping: Node 3.27.60.1 is alive pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:47:18 debug: debug2: ping_close: Closed connection to 3.27.60.1 p "General Linux-HA mailing list" <[email protected]> napisał(a): > Below is part of the output with error message produced by command: > /usr/lib64/heartbeat/pingd -VVV -a pingd -d 10 -m 1000 -h 3.27.60.1 > > The machine has three network interfaces and is connected to three different > subnets (3.27.x.x, 192.168.x.x - cluster subnet, 172.22.x.x - dedicated for > heartbeat). > > pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:44:36 debug: debug2: ping_close: Closed > connection to 3.27.60.1 > pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:44:36 debug: send_update: Sent update: pingd=1000 > (1 active ping nodes) > pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:44:37 debug: debug2: stand_alone_ping: Checking > connectivity > pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:44:37 debug: debug2: ping_open: Got address > 3.27.60.1 for 3.27.60.1 > pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:44:37 debug: debug2: ping_open: Opened connection > to 3.27.60.1 > pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:44:37 debug: debug2: ping_write: Sent 39 bytes to > 3.27.60.1 > pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:44:38 debug: debug2: ping_read: Got 59 bytes > pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:44:38 debug: debug2: dump_v4_echo: Echo from > 3.27.60.1 (exp=1080, seq=1080, id=6890, dest=3.27.60.1, data=pingd-v4): Echo > Reply > pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:44:38 debug: stand_alone_ping: Node 3.27.60.1 is > alive > pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:44:38 debug: debug2: ping_close: Closed > connection to 3.27.60.1 > pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:44:38 debug: send_update: Sent update: pingd=1000 > (1 active ping nodes) > pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:44:38 debug: debug2: stand_alone_ping: Checking > connectivity > pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:44:38 debug: debug2: ping_open: Got address > 3.27.60.1 for 3.27.60.1 > pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:44:38 debug: debug2: ping_open: Opened connection > to 3.27.60.1 > pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:44:38 debug: debug2: ping_write: Sent 39 bytes to > 3.27.60.1 > pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:44:39 debug: debug2: ping_read: Got 262 bytes > No error message: -1: Resource temporarily unavailable (11) > pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:44:39 debug: process_icmp_error: No error > message: -1: Resource temporarily unavailable (11) > pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:44:39 debug: debug2: dump_v4_echo: Echo from > 172.22.10.2 (exp=1081, seq=0, id=0, dest=3.27.60.1, data=E?): Unreachable > Port > pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:44:39 info: stand_alone_ping: Node 3.27.60.1 is > unreachable (read) > pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:44:40 debug: debug2: ping_write: Sent 39 bytes to > 3.27.60.1 > pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:44:40 debug: debug2: ping_read: Got 262 bytes > No error message: -1: Resource temporarily unavailable (11) > pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:44:40 debug: process_icmp_error: No error > message: -1: Resource temporarily unavailable (11) > pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:44:40 debug: debug2: dump_v4_echo: Echo from > 192.168.0.5 (exp=1082, seq=0, id=0, dest=3.27.60.1, data=E?): Unreachable > Port > pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:44:40 info: stand_alone_ping: Node 3.27.60.1 is > unreachable (read) > pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:44:41 debug: debug2: ping_close: Closed > connection to 3.27.60.1 > pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:44:41 debug: send_update: Sent update: pingd=0 (0 > active ping nodes) > pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:44:41 debug: debug2: stand_alone_ping: Checking > connectivity > pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:44:41 debug: debug2: ping_open: Got address > 3.27.60.1 for 3.27.60.1 > pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:44:41 debug: debug2: ping_open: Opened connection > to 3.27.60.1 > pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:44:41 debug: debug2: ping_write: Sent 39 bytes to > 3.27.60.1 > pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:44:41 debug: debug2: ping_read: Got 59 bytes > pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:44:41 debug: debug2: dump_v4_echo: Echo from > 3.27.60.1 (exp=1083, seq=1083, id=6890, dest=3.27.60.1, data=pingd-v4): Echo > Reply > pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:44:41 debug: stand_alone_ping: Node 3.27.60.1 is > alive > pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:44:41 debug: debug2: ping_close: Closed > connection to 3.27.60.1 > pingd[6890]: 2009/07/24_14:44:41 debug: send_update: Sent update: pingd=1000 > (1 active ping nodes) > > Thanks > Jarek > > "General Linux-HA mailing list" <[email protected]> napisał(a): > > 2009/7/24 <[email protected]>: > > > > > > Rpm built for RHEL5: > > > heartbeat-common-2.99.2-8.1 > > > libheartbeat2-2.99.2-8.1 > > > heartbeat-2.99.2-8.1 > > > heartbeat-resources-2.99.2-8.1 > > > pacemaker-1.0.3-2.2 > > > pacemaker-mgmt-client-1.99.1-2.1 > > > libpacemaker3-1.0.3-2.2 > > > pacemaker-mgmt-1.99.1-2.1 > > > > > > If i start pingd manually (beside working heartbeat+pacemaker) it gives > me following when in /var/log/ha-debug appears "stand_alone_ping: Node > xx.yy.zz.ww is unreachable (read)": > > > > > > [r...@gate2]# date ;/usr/lib64/heartbeat/pingd -a pingd -d 10 -m 1000 > -h xx.yy.zz.ww; date > > > Thu Jul 23 19:25:24 CEST 2009 > > > No error message: -1: Resource temporarily unavailable (11) > > > No error message: -1: Resource temporarily unavailable (11) > > > No error message: -1: Resource temporarily unavailable (11) > > > No error message: -1: Resource temporarily unavailable (11) > > > No error message: -1: Resource temporarily unavailable (11) > > > No error message: -1: Resource temporarily unavailable (11) > > > ... > > > > > > System ping reports no errors. > > > > > > > If you repeat that test with some extra -V arguments, you should see > > more information (which would be helpful). > > But its pretty clear there must be a bug, so its probably worth > > creating an entry in bugzilla. > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux-HA mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
