On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Nikita Michalko <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > what is the difference, if I go for crm cluster with 0.6?
You can do a rolling upgrade from 2.1.4 with the crm to pacemaker-0.6 Recent testing indicates that rolling upgrades to pacemaker-1.0 wont work. You can use the detach-reattach method though. http://clusterlabs.org/wiki/Upgrade > > TIA > Nikita Michalko > > Am Montag, 4. Mai 2009 08:58 schrieb Andrew Beekhof: >> haresources clusters should be fine. >> for crm clusters it depends if you go for 1.0 or 0.6 >> >> On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Mike Sweetser - Adhost >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hello: >> > >> > I'm looking to migrate an existing Heartbeat 2.1.4 installation to >> > 2.9.9. Would it be possible to upgrade the servers one at a time, which >> > would require running one server with 2.1.4 and one server with 2.9.9 >> > for a short period? Would there be any incompatibility issues in doing >> > so? >> > >> > Thank You, >> > Mike Sweetser >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Linux-HA mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >> > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Linux-HA mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
