Hi *,

 

I have a group with one OCF and one LSB resource defined into a clone
(OCF-Clone + LSB-primitive in a group didn't work). 

 

Clone Set: clone_ldirectord

    Resource Group: group_clone_ldirectord_lvs-monitor:0

        resource_ldirectord:0   (ocf::heartbeat:ldirectord):    Started
server2

        lvs-monitor:0   (lsb:lvs-monitor):      Started server2

    Resource Group: group_clone_ldirectord_lvs-monitor:1

        resource_ldirectord:1   (ocf::heartbeat:ldirectord):    Started
server1

        lvs-monitor:1   (lsb:lvs-monitor):      Started server1

    Resource Group: group_clone_ldirectord_lvs-monitor:2

        resource_ldirectord:2   (ocf::heartbeat:ldirectord):    Started
server3

        lvs-monitor:2   (lsb:lvs-monitor):      Started server3

 

Now I get this confusing error-message on all 3 nodes when verifying
with crm_verify:

 

[r...@server2:~]$ crm_verify -LV

crm_verify[20534]: 2009/01/09_12:28:27 WARN: unpack_rsc_op:
resource_ldirectord:0_monitor_0 found active resource_ldirectord:0 on
server2

crm_verify[20534]: 2009/01/09_12:28:27 WARN: unpack_rsc_op:
resource_ldirectord:1_monitor_0 found active resource_ldirectord:1 on
server2

crm_verify[20534]: 2009/01/09_12:28:27 WARN: unpack_rsc_op:
resource_ldirectord:2_monitor_0 found active resource_ldirectord:2 on
server2

crm_verify[20534]: 2009/01/09_12:28:27 WARN: unpack_rsc_op:
lvs-monitor:2_monitor_0 found active lvs-monitor:2 on server2

crm_verify[20534]: 2009/01/09_12:28:27 WARN: unpack_rsc_op:
lvs-monitor:0_monitor_0 found active lvs-monitor:0 on server2

crm_verify[20534]: 2009/01/09_12:28:27 WARN: unpack_rsc_op:
lvs-monitor:1_monitor_0 found active lvs-monitor:1 on server2

 

Why does crm_verify display on all nodes that all resources are active
on server2?

Apart from the error-message everything looks ok, but how can I confirm
that it is only a crm_verify problem or bug?

 

Thanks for advice,

 

Arndt

 




_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to