On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 00:11, David Pinkerton H
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> have you seen this page?
>   http://linux-ha.org/v2/Concepts/MultiState
>
>
> This page does not seem logical to me.  If I create a resource in a two node 
> cluster, as a master/slave with clone_max = 2, clone_node_max = 1,
> master_max = 1, master_node_max = 1
>
> Then that infers that one instance of the resource will run on both nodes and 
> only one will be master; the other slave.
>
> But this is not what happens.  Why do both resources try to be master on 
> there respective nodes?   How do I stop this behaviour?

How can I possibly know?  I can't see what you see.

If you think its broken, create a bug and attach a hb_report archive.
But almost certainly there is a bug in your resource agent... please
test it with ocf-tester

>
> What I am trying to achieve is a resource running on both nodes.  One as 
> master and the other as slave.  When the master fails, the slave is promoted 
> to master.  When the old master is restored it resumes in slave mode.
>
> My resource script is setting crm_master on both resources.  100 for master 
> and 1 for slave (doc states it must be greater than 0 if you ever want to 
> promote to master).
>
>
>
>
>
> This email and any attachments may contain privileged and confidential 
> information
> and are intended for the named addressee only. If you have received this 
> e-mail in
> error, please notify the sender and delete this e-mail immediately. Any
> confidentiality, privilege or copyright is not waived or lost because this 
> e-mail
> has been sent to you in error. It is your responsibility to check this e-mail 
> and
> any attachments for viruses.  No warranty is made that this material is free 
> from
> computer virus or any other defect or error.  Any loss/damage incurred by 
> using this
> material is not the sender's responsibility.  The sender's entire liability 
> will be
> limited to resupplying the material.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to