On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 20:25, Raghuram Bondalapati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Andrew, the failover of xinetd works fine when i replace xinetd binary > with a binary from different Hardware architecture to simulate xinted > startup failure even though no fencing resource is defined. > > However it does not failover if I change the permisisons on original xinted > binary to 000. Why is fencing resource needed in this case and not for the > above scenario.
it depends on what your RA reported in both cases. but one thing is for certain, the cluster cant fencing anything if you dont give it any means to (by defining a stonith resource) > Can you please also point me to some documentation on setting up fencing > resources. http://www.linux-ha.org/ConfiguringStonithPlugins _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
