FWIW, the "Exploring HASF" document does NOT use private containers. It
uses shared containers, so you will need to adjust some things, in
particular the type of CSM container (shared -> private), and use the
evms_failover RA instead of the evmsSCC RA.

Yan

Chris wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>                 Thanks for your reply.
> 
> Yes, I got that doc, however it goes through the integration of OCFS2
> and Heartbeat2 using the command line, while my test are with the
> usage of reiserfs (or ext3) and the hb_gui.
> 
> I mean, if the resource configuration in order to have the private
> container resource to failover properly MUST be done using the command
> line, for any valid reason, than I will of course go through that way,
> otherwise I would really like to find the proper way of doing it using
> the hb_gui.
> 
> Anyway, I will go through the doc once again and I'll double check if
> I can find some hints I eventually missed in the first read.
> 
> Thanks,
>            Chris
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Nov 21, 2007 3:07 PM, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Nov 21, 2007, at 10:11 AM, Christian Zemella wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>        Anybody out there managed to have EVMS container resources
>>> properly failing over in a 2 node Heartbeat 2 cluster running on SLES
>>> 10 SP1 ?
>> I believe so... have you read the documentation below?
>>     http://wiki.novell.com/images/3/37/Exploring_HASF.pdf
>>
>>>
>>> In my lab I can only start and stop the resource on the node that has
>>> the container assigned within evms, while if I shut down that node,
>>> the fail over does not occur as the evms_failover resource goes in
>>> time out; as soon as the other nodes comes up again it takes the
>>> resource back properly.
>>>
>>> In my environment I created the following:
>>>
>>> I'm working using 2 VMWare boxes sharing one 4GB plain disk that
>>> works as SAN;
>>>
>>> EVMS:
>>>
>>> I created a private container (gwcont) on the shared disk using CSM
>>> plug-in and in it an EVMS Volume (gwvol);
>>> on the volume i make a reiserfs file system;
>>> I verified that the HA plug-in was working and that the node assigned
>>> to the container can manually mount it.
>>>
>>> HB_GUI:
>>>
>>> I created a group ordered and collocated;
>>> Inside the group i created the following resources:
>>> - evmsSCC --> no No attributes, No Parameters;
>>> - evms_failover --> Parameter: 1 Value: gwcont (name of the EVMS
>>> container )
>>> - Filesystem --> Parameter: fstype Value: reiserfs; Parameter: device
>>> Value: /dev/evms/gwcont/gwvol; Parameter: directory Value: /gw;
>>> - IPAddr --> Parameter ip Value: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
>>>
>>> I then created a Location constraint so to assign the value 100 for
>>> the group to run on Node 1, and a second Location constraint so to
>>> assign the value 50 for the group to run on Node2.
>>>
>>> ha.cf:
>>>
>>> ***
>>> autojoin any
>>> crm true
>>> ucast eth1 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx (ipaddress of eth1 on the other node)
>>> auto_failback off
>>> node CZVLabNode1
>>> node CZVLabNode2
>>> respawn hacluster /usr/lib/heartbeat/ccm
>>> respawn root /sbin/evmsd
>>> apiauth evms uid=hacluster,root
>>> apiauth ccm uid=hacluster, root
>>> apiauth crm uid=hacluster,root
>>> ***
>>>
>>> On both nodes I issued:
>>>
>>> chkconfig boot.evms on
>>>
>>> My feeling is that I'm doing something wrong in the configuration,
>>> anybody can point me to the error I'm eventually doing here ?
>>>
>>> TIA,
>>>      Chris
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Linux-HA mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
>>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux-HA mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to