Hi, On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 06:33:09PM +0200, Raoul Bhatia [IPAX] wrote: > Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > >>shouldn't > >>there be a check to avoid this kind of split-brain situation? > > > >What do you mean by "this kind"? BTW, split brain conditions > >should be avoided at any cost. That doesn't mean however that we > >shouldn't do our best to recover from them. > > "this kind" = one node marking the other one as dead when the hb network > link goes down for a short amount of time thou nothing changes while the > other one still thinks both nodes are up. > > >>do you need any further information? > > > >You could attach the logs to the bugzilla file. > > xx_cib_running.xml.gz = cibadmin -Q > file > xx_crm_mon_1 = crm_mon -1 > file > > please note that i wasn't able to issue "cibadmin -Q" on the non-dc node > (webcluster02). i received a timeout.
cibadmin -Ql prints the local CIB. Without -l it tries the DC. > ill also attach it to the bugzilla issue. Thanks. But, one really should not bring down an interface over which heartbeats are flowing. Dejan > cheers, > raoul bhatia > -- > ____________________________________________________________________ > DI (FH) Raoul Bhatia M.Sc. email. [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Technischer Leiter > > IPAX - Aloy Bhatia Hava OEG web. http://www.ipax.at > Barawitzkagasse 10/2/2/11 email. [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 1190 Wien tel. +43 1 3670030 > FN 277995t HG Wien fax. +43 1 3670030 15 > ____________________________________________________________________ > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
