On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 00:33 +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 05:04:16PM -0500, Dave Augustus wrote: > > 6 servers- all running heartbeat > > 1 is LVS loadbalancer > > the other 5 are lvs realservers > > > > 2 resource groups: > > 1 for the loadbalancer > > 1 CLONE resource group for the real servers > > > > The loadbalancer can be ANY of the 6 servers. > > If a server is NOT the load balancer, then it runs as a real server. > > > > Is this a supported configuration? > > Yes. If I understood correctly. Just setup a clone with > clone_node_max set to 1. And an extra constraint to make room for > the other resource which would say "don't run these two on the > same node". Furthermore, make sure that the score for the > loadbalancer resource is always higher than for the clone. >
OK, I setup currently has 4 nodes. I clone_node_max to 1 and it ran a resource group *twice* on the same node. Is this a bug? Dave > > Am I understanding this correctly? > > Not sure to what do you refer. > > Thanks, > > Dejan > > > This is quite amazing to me! > > > > Dave > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux-HA mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
