----- Mail original ----- > De: "Thomas Lange" <la...@cs.uni-koeln.de> > À: "linux-fai" <linux-fai@uni-koeln.de> > Envoyé: Mardi 14 Juillet 2020 15:45:06 > Objet: Re: Fai.me failed minimal install when GUI and non-free are enable
>>>>>> On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 15:24:53 +0200 (CEST), Jean-mathieu CHANTREIN >>>>>> <jean-mathieu.chantr...@univ-angers.fr> said: > > > I'll try to use fai.me to generate an iso with GUI and some package. > > After some tests, I think there is a problem with the simultaneous use of > > non-free and GUI enable (and may be backports enable to). > > > A minimal install with no GUI, non-free and backports enable work. > > A minimal install with GUI and backports work. > > But, with a minimal install with GUI, non-free and backports enable, > there is a > > dependancy problem when fai install non-free package (linux-image-amd64: > > Depends linux-image-5.6.0-0.bpo.2-amd64 [...] but it is not going to be > > installed) > > You can see error.log and software.log at 1'20 and 2'28 in this > virtualbox > > record output here: > > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1M5bYxdHOiw0DerFxNmjwigD8utpPkuuS/view?usp=sharing > > or reproduce the error with the ISO defined below. > > > Have you ever had this type of problem with fai.me and if so, how did > you fix > > it? > Salut Jean-mathieu, > > I finally found the strange bug. > The kernel package from buster backports breaks if the version of the > wireless-regdb package from stable is installed. This is what happens > in your config because the Gnome enviroment or the nonfree firmware > will install wireless-regdb from stable. > > It's very hard to get the correct package list in this special > situation. Therefore I found a simple fix, which adds wireless-regdb > into the backports config. > > The technical details are more complicated and not in FAI itself, but > IMO this workaround is simple and works. A test using a new FAI.me > image showed no problems now. > > -- > regards Thomas Hallo Thomas, Thanks a lot, it's works fine now. Regards, Jean-Mathieu
