Hi Michael ! Thanks for taking time to dig into this issue !
Le jeudi 16 décembre 2010 à 14:47 +0100, Michael Tautschnig a écrit : > I finally got around to look into this and it might be that indeed it > would be > better not to declare this configuration as being "correct" - and go > for another > one instead. Could you give the following configuration a try? [...] > disk_config disk2 > raw-disk - 0 - - [...] > The problem with entirely leaving out disk2/sdb is that setup-storage does not > know whether it may put a new disk label on that device or whether that would > corrupt a disk setup-storage should not have touched. [...] Ok, I agree with you. > > Mât, could you please give this config another try? Of course ! I'll give it a chance in a few minutes :) I admit, I should not update setup-storage, "raw-disk - 0 - -" is already an understood syntax. Bests Mât
