> The fs-specific field solution from this patchset is much more efficient > than the rhashtable: efficient enough that we don't really have to worry > about it, regardless of fscrypt or fsverity. So I think it's a good > middle ground, and I'd like to just do it this way.
I agree. _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
