Just two extra minor nits...

First, the subject line would be
"erofs: free pclusters if no cached folio is attached"

On 2024/11/11 19:38, Chunhai Guo wrote:
Once a pcluster is fully decompressed and there are no attached cached
folios, its corresponding `struct z_erofs_pcluster` will be freed. This
will significantly reduce the frequency of calls to erofs_shrink_scan()
and the memory allocated for `struct z_erofs_pcluster`.

The tables below show approximately a 96% reduction in the calls to
erofs_shrink_scan() and in the memory allocated for `struct
z_erofs_pcluster` after applying this patch. The results were obtained
by performing a test to copy a 4.1GB partition on ARM64 Android devices
running the 6.6 kernel with an 8-core CPU and 12GB of memory.

1. The reduction in calls to erofs_shrink_scan():
+-----------------+-----------+----------+---------+
|                 | w/o patch | w/ patch |  diff   |
+-----------------+-----------+----------+---------+
| Average (times) |   11390   |   390    | -96.57% |
+-----------------+-----------+----------+---------+

2. The reduction in memory released by erofs_shrink_scan():
+-----------------+-----------+----------+---------+
|                 | w/o patch | w/ patch |  diff   |
+-----------------+-----------+----------+---------+
| Average (Byte)  | 133612656 | 4434552  | -96.68% |
+-----------------+-----------+----------+---------+

Signed-off-by: Chunhai Guo <guochun...@vivo.com>

...

-static void z_erofs_put_pcluster(struct z_erofs_pcluster *pcl)
+static void z_erofs_put_pcluster(struct erofs_sb_info *sbi,
+               struct z_erofs_pcluster *pcl, bool try_free)
  {
+       bool free = false;
+
        if (lockref_put_or_lock(&pcl->lockref))
                return;
DBG_BUGON(__lockref_is_dead(&pcl->lockref));
-       if (pcl->lockref.count == 1)
-               atomic_long_inc(&erofs_global_shrink_cnt);
-       --pcl->lockref.count;
+       if (--pcl->lockref.count == 0) {

Second, EROFS codebase uses `!--pcl->lockref.count`
coding style instead of `== 0` since the old checkpatch.pl
will complain this and I'd like to keep consistentency..

Otherwise it looks good to me, if you send out a
new version, I will apply directly.

Thanks,
Gao Xiang

Reply via email to