According to your suggestions: > That is also fine with me, anyway, liberofsfuse is a very special > case for us, I'd like to just build a static library for > erofsfuse only (because liberofs will be exported as a dynamic > library in later versions, I don't want to rely on random libfuse > interface). > > For other usage, I'd suggest form some formal APIs in liberofs > instead.
I create a new patch which only for exporting 'liberofsfuse.a'. Thanks, He YuMing
