On 4/19/24 8:36 PM, Baokun Li wrote:

> @@ -761,12 +747,15 @@ static void erofs_free_dev_context(struct 
> erofs_dev_context *devs)
>  
>  static void erofs_fc_free(struct fs_context *fc)
>  {
> -     struct erofs_fs_context *ctx = fc->fs_private;
> +     struct erofs_sb_info *sbi = fc->s_fs_info;
> +
> +     if (!sbi)
> +             return;


This is the only difference comparing to the original code literally.
Is there any chance that fc->s_fs_info can be NULL when erofs_fc_free()
is called?

Otherwise looks good to me.



-- 
Thanks,
Jingbo

Reply via email to