(Cc: Maxime, Thomas, Maarten) On Thu Jan 29, 2026 at 2:08 AM CET, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > That's what I've been advocating for. The best way to ensure that driver > code will not accessed data freed at .remove() time is to prevent the > code to run at all.
With this we are in full agreement, I think that'd be best too. But, I also think that sometimes this isn't possible. For instance, DRM has such a case with atomic mode setting.
