> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com> 
> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2025 7:46 PM
> To: Chia-Yu Chang (Nokia) <chia-yu.ch...@nokia-bell-labs.com>; Neal Cardwell 
> <ncardw...@google.com>
> Cc: pab...@redhat.com; linux-doc@vger.kernel.org; cor...@lwn.net; 
> ho...@kernel.org; dsah...@kernel.org; kun...@amazon.com; 
> b...@vger.kernel.org; net...@vger.kernel.org; j...@mojatatu.com; 
> k...@kernel.org; step...@networkplumber.org; xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com; 
> j...@resnulli.us; da...@davemloft.net; andrew+net...@lunn.ch; 
> donald.hun...@gmail.com; a...@fiberby.net; liuhang...@gmail.com; 
> sh...@kernel.org; linux-kselft...@vger.kernel.org; i...@kernel.org; Koen De 
> Schepper (Nokia) <koen.de_schep...@nokia-bell-labs.com>; 
> g.wh...@cablelabs.com; ingemar.s.johans...@ericsson.com; 
> mirja.kuehlew...@ericsson.com; chesh...@apple.com; rs.i...@gmx.at; 
> jason_living...@comcast.com; vidhi_g...@apple.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 net-next 10/14] tcp: accecn: AccECN option
> 
> 
> CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking 
> links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional 
> information.
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 7:58 AM Chia-Yu Chang (Nokia) 
> <chia-yu.ch...@nokia-bell-labs.com> wrote:
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com>
> > > Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2025 2:30 PM
> > > To: Chia-Yu Chang (Nokia) <chia-yu.ch...@nokia-bell-labs.com>
> > > Cc: pab...@redhat.com; linux-doc@vger.kernel.org; cor...@lwn.net; 
> > > ho...@kernel.org; dsah...@kernel.org; kun...@amazon.com; 
> > > b...@vger.kernel.org; net...@vger.kernel.org; dave.t...@gmail.com; 
> > > j...@mojatatu.com; k...@kernel.org; step...@networkplumber.org; 
> > > xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com; j...@resnulli.us; da...@davemloft.net; 
> > > andrew+net...@lunn.ch; donald.hun...@gmail.com; a...@fiberby.net; 
> > > liuhang...@gmail.com; sh...@kernel.org; 
> > > linux-kselft...@vger.kernel.org; i...@kernel.org; 
> > > ncardw...@google.com; Koen De Schepper (Nokia) 
> > > <koen.de_schep...@nokia-bell-labs.com>; g.wh...@cablelabs.com; 
> > > ingemar.s.johans...@ericsson.com; mirja.kuehlew...@ericsson.com; 
> > > chesh...@apple.com; rs.i...@gmx.at; jason_living...@comcast.com; 
> > > vidhi_g...@apple.com
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 net-next 10/14] tcp: accecn: AccECN option
> > >
> > >
> > > CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking 
> > > links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional 
> > > information.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 1:40 AM <chia-yu.ch...@nokia-bell-labs.com> wrote:
> > [...]
> > > >  /* Used for make_synack to form the ACE flags */ diff --git 
> > > > a/include/uapi/linux/tcp.h b/include/uapi/linux/tcp.h index 
> > > > bdac8c42fa82..53e0e85b52be 100644
> > > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/tcp.h
> > > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/tcp.h
> > > > @@ -316,6 +316,13 @@ struct tcp_info {
> > > >                                          * in milliseconds, including 
> > > > any
> > > >                                          * unfinished recovery.
> > > >                                          */
> > > > +       __u32   tcpi_received_ce;    /* # of CE marks received */
> > > > +       __u32   tcpi_delivered_e1_bytes;  /* Accurate ECN byte counters 
> > > > */
> > > > +       __u32   tcpi_delivered_e0_bytes;
> > > > +       __u32   tcpi_delivered_ce_bytes;
> > > > +       __u32   tcpi_received_e1_bytes;
> > > > +       __u32   tcpi_received_e0_bytes;
> > > > +       __u32   tcpi_received_ce_bytes;
> > > >  };
> > > >
> > >
> > > We do not add more fields to tcp_info, unless added fields are a multiple 
> > > of 64 bits.
> > >
> > > Otherwise a hole is added and can not be recovered.
> >
> > Hi Eric,
> >
> > Thanks for the feedback.
> >
> > Then, would it make sense to add __u32 reserved; here or this is not an 
> > option?
> >
> 
> I would prefer we take the opportunity to export a 32bit field right there, 
> instead of a hole.
> 
> A reserved field makes it difficult for ss commands to know if a new kernel 
> is using it for a different purpose.
> 
> Neal, any idea of what would be useful ?
> 
> I was thinking lately of sk_err_soft, but I am not yet convinced.

Hi Eric,

I have not heard anything from Neal.

Do you think other fields can be exported to this 32-bit field?

Another way is to increase them from u32 to u64.

Chia-Yu

Reply via email to