On 21.05.25 14:33, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
Fundamentally I trust you to make sure this all goes correctly so let's not
belabour the point or delay things here :)
So in that vein, Nico - I would sugesst for future respins adding a really
clear bit to the header as David suggested :) also update the cover letter
tests so it isn't reliant on a possibly ephemeral web link.
But otherwise let's proceed as was.
Right, and maybe only post this series if there was a major change,
otherwise wait until the other thing is on it's way upstream.
On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 02:24:45PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
Anyhow, to me the dependency is obvious, but I've followed the MM meeting
discussions, development etc.
Right but is it clear to Andrew? I mean the cover letter was super unclear
to me.
I mean, assuming that it would not be clear to Andrew (and I think it is
clear to Andrew), I we would get CCed on these emails and could immediately
scream STOOOOOP :)
And until this would hit mm-stable, a bit more time would pass.
What's to prevent things getting merged out of order?
Fortunately, there are still people working here and not machines (at least,
that's what I hope).
Obligatory link to this :P
It's scary how relevant that has become lately :D
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5lsExRvJTAI
... fortunately, whenever I tell the chatbots that they are wrong (IOW,
everytime I use them) they reply with "Oh yes, you are right." ... so
far ...
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
