On Thu, May 08, 2025 at 08:02:38PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> An impl driver might want to allocate its own type of vIOMMU object or the
> standard IOMMU_VIOMMU_TYPE_ARM_SMMUV3 by setting up its own SW/HW bits, as
> the tegra241-cmdqv driver will add IOMMU_VIOMMU_TYPE_TEGRA241_CMDQV.
>
> Add a vsmmu_alloc op and prioritize it in arm_vsmmu_alloc().
>
> Reviewed-by: Pranjal Shrivastava <pr...@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicol...@nvidia.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h | 6 ++++++
> .../iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-iommufd.c | 17 +++++++++++------
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> index 6b8f0d20dac3..a5835af72417 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> #include <linux/sizes.h>
>
> struct arm_smmu_device;
> +struct arm_smmu_domain;
>
> /* MMIO registers */
> #define ARM_SMMU_IDR0 0x0
> @@ -720,6 +721,11 @@ struct arm_smmu_impl_ops {
> int (*init_structures)(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu);
> struct arm_smmu_cmdq *(*get_secondary_cmdq)(
> struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent *ent);
> + struct arm_vsmmu *(*vsmmu_alloc)(
> + struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
> + struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain, struct iommufd_ctx *ictx,
> + unsigned int viommu_type,
> + const struct iommu_user_data *user_data);
> };
I think you should put the supported viommu type here in the ops
struct and match it here:
> + /* Prioritize the impl that may support IOMMU_VIOMMU_TYPE_ARM_SMMUV3 */
> + if (master->smmu->impl_ops && master->smmu->impl_ops->vsmmu_alloc)
> + vsmmu = master->smmu->impl_ops->vsmmu_alloc(
> + master->smmu, s2_parent, ictx, viommu_type, user_data);
instead of the EOPNOTSUPP dance. Either the impl_ops supports the
requested viommu as an extension or we are running in the normal mode?
Is there a reason to allocate a different viommu if the userspace does
not enable the implementation specific features?
Jason
