On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 08:00:37AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > From: Nicolin Chen <nicol...@nvidia.com>
> > Sent: Friday, April 11, 2025 2:38 PM
> > 
> > @@ -128,6 +142,9 @@ struct iommufd_viommu_ops {
> >             const struct iommu_user_data *user_data);
> >     int (*cache_invalidate)(struct iommufd_viommu *viommu,
> >                             struct iommu_user_data_array *array);
> > +   struct iommufd_vdevice *(*vdevice_alloc)(struct iommufd_viommu
> > *viommu,
> > +                                            struct device *dev, u64 id);
> 
> s/id/virt_id/ would be clearer.

OK.

@@ -143,7 +143,8 @@ struct iommufd_viommu_ops {
        int (*cache_invalidate)(struct iommufd_viommu *viommu,
                                struct iommu_user_data_array *array);
        struct iommufd_vdevice *(*vdevice_alloc)(struct iommufd_viommu *viommu,
-                                                struct device *dev, u64 id);
+                                                struct device *dev,
+                                                u64 virt_id);
        void (*vdevice_destroy)(struct iommufd_vdevice *vdev);
 };


Thanks
Nicolin

Reply via email to