Hi, Nico On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 at 01:35, Nicolin Chen <nicol...@nvidia.com> wrote: > > Use it to store all vSMMU-related data. The vsid (Virtual Stream ID) will > be the first use case. Since the vsid reader will be the eventq handler > that already holds a streams_mutex, reuse that to fenche the vmaster too. > > Also add a pair of arm_smmu_attach_prepare/commit_vmaster helpers to set > or unset the master->vmaster point. Put these helpers inside the existing > arm_smmu_attach_prepare/commit(). > > For identity/blocked ops that don't call arm_smmu_attach_prepare/commit(), > add a simpler arm_smmu_master_clear_vmaster helper to unset the vmaster. > > Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <j...@nvidia.com> > Reviewed-by: Pranjal Shrivastavat <pr...@google.com> > Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicol...@nvidia.com> > ---
> > +int arm_smmu_attach_prepare_vmaster(struct arm_smmu_attach_state *state, > + struct arm_smmu_nested_domain > *nested_domain) > +{ > + struct arm_smmu_vmaster *vmaster; > + unsigned long vsid; > + int ret; > + > + iommu_group_mutex_assert(state->master->dev); > + > + /* Skip invalid vSTE */ > + if (!(nested_domain->ste[0] & cpu_to_le64(STRTAB_STE_0_V))) > + return 0; Why this is removed in v9 and 6.15-rc1? I tested 6.15-rc1 the qemu failed to boot with qemu branch: for_iommufd_veventq-v8 "failed to attach the bypass pagetable" After adding this "skip check" back, the qemu works again. Do we need to add this back? Thanks