On Mon, 3 Mar 2025 15:20:33 +0900 Akihiko Odaki wrote: > > # 5.90 [+0.00] ok 14 tun_vnet_hash.unclassified > > # 5.90 [+0.00] # RUN tun_vnet_hash.ipv4 ... > > # 6.18 [+0.28] # tun.c:669:ipv4:Expected 0 (0) != > > tun_vnet_hash_check(self->source_fd, self->dest_fds, &packet, > > sizeof(packet), 0, VIRTIO_NET_HASH_REPORT_IPv4, 0x6e45d952) (0) > > # 15.09 [+8.92] # ipv4: Test failed > > # 15.10 [+0.00] # FAIL tun_vnet_hash.ipv4 > > # 15.10 [+0.00] not ok 15 tun_vnet_hash.ipv4 > > # 15.10 [+0.00] # RUN tun_vnet_hash.tcpv4 ... > > # 15.36 [+0.26] # tun.c:689:tcpv4:Expected 0 (0) != > > tun_vnet_hash_check(self->source_fd, self->dest_fds, &packet, > > sizeof(packet), VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_DATA_VALID, VIRTIO_NET_HASH_REPORT_TCPv4, > > 0xfb63539a) (0) > > # 24.76 [+9.40] # tcpv4: Test failed > > # 24.76 [+0.00] # FAIL tun_vnet_hash.tcpv4 > > # 24.76 [+0.00] not ok 16 tun_vnet_hash.tcpv4 > > # 24.77 [+0.00] # RUN tun_vnet_hash.udpv4 ... > > # 25.05 [+0.28] # tun.c:710:udpv4:Expected 0 (0) != > > tun_vnet_hash_check(self->source_fd, self->dest_fds, &packet, > > sizeof(packet), VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_DATA_VALID, VIRTIO_NET_HASH_REPORT_UDPv4, > > 0xfb63539a) (0) > > # 32.11 [+7.06] # udpv4: Test failed > > # 32.11 [+0.00] # FAIL tun_vnet_hash.udpv4 > > # 32.11 [+0.00] not ok 17 tun_vnet_hash.udpv4 > > I cannot reproduce the failure. What commit did you apply this patch > series on? What architecture did the kernel run on?
x86 inside vng, see this for exact details: https://github.com/linux-netdev/nipa/wiki/How-to-run-netdev-selftests-CI-style The tests are run on top of net-next + net (the two networking trees merged together).
