On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 03:45:33PM -0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-iommufd.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-iommufd.c
> @@ -95,8 +95,6 @@ int arm_smmu_attach_prepare_vmaster(struct
> arm_smmu_attach_state *state,
>
> iommu_group_mutex_assert(state->master->dev);
>
> - if (domain->type != IOMMU_DOMAIN_NESTED)
> - return 0;
> nested_domain = to_smmu_nested_domain(domain);
>
> /* Skip invalid vSTE */
> @@ -122,19 +120,9 @@ void arm_smmu_attach_commit_vmaster(struct
> arm_smmu_attach_state *state)
> {
> struct arm_smmu_master *master = state->master;
>
> - mutex_lock(&master->smmu->streams_mutex);
> - if (state->vmaster != master->vmaster) {
> - kfree(master->vmaster);
> - master->vmaster = state->vmaster;
> - }
> - mutex_unlock(&master->smmu->streams_mutex);
> -}
> -
> -void arm_smmu_master_clear_vmaster(struct arm_smmu_master *master)
> -{
> mutex_lock(&master->smmu->streams_mutex);
> kfree(master->vmaster);
> - master->vmaster = NULL;
> + master->vmaster = state->vmaster;
> mutex_unlock(&master->smmu->streams_mutex);
> }
I'd leave the clear_vmaster just for clarity. Commit should not be
unpaired with prepare in the other functions.
It looks fine with this on top too
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <j...@nvidia.com>
Jason
