Hi Alex, On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 9:21 PM Alexandre Ghiti <alexgh...@rivosinc.com> wrote: > > Hi Yunhui, > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 3:40 AM Yunhui Cui <cuiyun...@bytedance.com> wrote: > > > > v1/v2: > > There is only the first patch: RISC-V: Enable cbo.clean/flush in usermode, > > which mainly removes the enabling of cbo.inval in user mode. > > > > v3: > > Add the functionality of Expose Zicbom and selftests for Zicbom. > > > > v4: > > Modify the order of macros, The test_no_cbo_inval function is added > > separately. > > > > v5: > > 1. Modify the order of RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_ZICBOM_BLOCK_SIZE in hwprobe.rst > > 2. "TEST_NO_ZICBOINVAL" -> "TEST_NO_CBO_INVAL" > > > > Yunhui Cui (3): > > RISC-V: Enable cbo.clean/flush in usermode > > RISC-V: hwprobe: Expose Zicbom extension and its block size > > RISC-V: selftests: Add TEST_ZICBOM into CBO tests > > > > Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst | 6 ++ > > arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h | 2 +- > > arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h | 2 + > > arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 8 +++ > > arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c | 6 ++ > > tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/cbo.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++---- > > 6 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > > > -- > > 2.39.2 > > > > So a v6 needs to be sent with: > > - the fix for hwprobe_ext0_has() reported by kernel test robot > - a rebase on top of 6.14 since patch 2 will conflict with > RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_VENDOR_EXT_THEAD_0
Thank you for the reminder. In fact, version 6 was sent out almost a month ago. Reference: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250124035959.45499-1-cuiyun...@bytedance.com/ > > Do you think you can do that soon so that it gets merged in 6.15? The > patchset received a lot of RB so it would be too bad to miss this > release. > > Thanks, > > Alex Thanks, Yunhui
