On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 11:02 AM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 04:35:12PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: > > On Mon 2025-02-10 13:23:21, Tamir Duberstein wrote: > > > This is one of just 3 remaining "Test Module" kselftests (the others > > > being bitmap and scanf), the rest having been converted to KUnit. > > > > > > I tested this using: > > > > > > $ tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 > > > printf > > > > > > I have also sent out a series converting scanf[0]. > > > > > > Link: > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250204-scanf-kunit-convert-v3-0-386d7c3ee...@gmail.com/T/#u > > > [0] > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tam...@gmail.com> > > > > I have just quickly tested this before leaving for a week. > > And I am fine with the result. > > Seems reasonable to me. But I want a consensus with Rasmus.
I have a local v4 where I've added the same enhancement as the scanf patches so that assertions log the line in the top-level test. I'll wait for Rasmus' reply before sending. Tamir
