Hello Bagas, On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 08:50:22AM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote: > On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 03:05:59AM -0800, Breno Leitao wrote: > > +.. note:: > > + > > + If the user has set a conflicting `cpu` key in the userdata dictionary, > > + both keys will be reported, with the kernel-populated entry appearing > > after > > + the user one. For example:: > > In that case, shouldn't the kernel autopopulates numbers of the rest of > CPUs?
Do you mean listing all the CPUs that are *not* sending the current message? Let me come up with an example to try to understand this better. Let's suppopse I have a machine with 64 cores, and cpu=42 is sending that current message, then I would see the following on the dictionary: cpu=42 You are suggesting we send all the other cpus, except 42 in a "key"? Thanks --breno
