Hi, On 2/4/25 8:13 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 17:49:38 +0200 Laurent Pinchart wrote: >> Or apparently project or customer names for consulting companies: >> >> 29 Kory Maincent (Dent Project) <kory.mainc...@bootlin.com> >> 34 Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation) <alexis.loth...@bootlin.com> > > FWIW these are customer names, indeed. Project/Foundation pays for > contracting work in both cases. > >> The other cases correctly refer to companeis, for contributors using >> other email addresses: >> >> 14 linux.dev >> 41 zytor.com >> 47 joelfernandes.org >> 176 alien8.de >> 243 gmail.com >> 333 goodmis.org >> 454 armlinux.org.uk >> 918 infradead.org >> 1007 kernel.org >> >> Do we want to only document existing practices, or also tell which >> one(s) should be favoured ? > > I'm hoping that documenting the most prevalent existing practice > will naturally make it favored. IOW I'd prefer to document just > one option. I don't really care which one we pick, but the brackets > seem most common. >
I thought that Signed-off-by: John Doe <j...@example.com> # Company would be acceptable also. It looks like that format is documented for Acked-by: but I don't know why it is not more generally applicable. I'm pretty sure that I have used it a few times. ;) -- ~Randy
