On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 03:06:41PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 11:01:10AM -0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
>
> > +/* This is basically iommu_vevent_arm_smmuv3 in u64 for conversion */
> > +struct arm_vsmmu_evt {
> > + union {
> > + u64 evt[EVTQ_ENT_DWORDS];
> > + struct iommu_vevent_arm_smmuv3 uevt;
> > + };
> > +};
>
> This doesn't seem right, don't make unions like this
This is copied from the invalidate union though... Any reason why
this is no longer good for evt v.s. cmd?
> > int arm_vmaster_report_event(struct arm_smmu_vmaster *vmaster, u64 *evt)
> > {
> > - struct iommu_vevent_arm_smmuv3 vevt =
> > - *(struct iommu_vevent_arm_smmuv3 *)evt;
>
> evt is clearly not a iommu_vevent_arm_smmuv3 since it has the wrong
> endianess? It should stay in its own type.
>
> struct struct iommu_vevent_arm_smmuv3 uevt;
>
> uet.evt[0] = cpu_to_le64((evt[0] & ~EVTQ_0_SID) | FIELD_PREP(EVTQ_0_SID,
> vmaster->vsid));
> for (i = 1; i != EVTQ_ENT_DWORDS; i++)
> uet.evt[i] = cpu_to_le64(evt[i]);
I will use this.
Thanks!
Nicolin
