Add test for Zicbom and its block size into CBO tests, when
Zicbom is present, test that cbo.clean/flush may be issued and works.
As the software can't verify the clean/flush functions, we just judged
that cbo.clean/flush isn't executed illegally.

Signed-off-by: Yunhui Cui <cuiyun...@bytedance.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/cbo.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/cbo.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/cbo.c
index a40541bb7c7d..b63e23f95e08 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/cbo.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/cbo.c
@@ -81,6 +81,30 @@ static bool is_power_of_2(__u64 n)
        return n != 0 && (n & (n - 1)) == 0;
 }
 
+static void test_zicbom(void *arg)
+{
+       struct riscv_hwprobe pair = {
+               .key = RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_ZICBOM_BLOCK_SIZE,
+       };
+       cpu_set_t *cpus = (cpu_set_t *)arg;
+       __u64 block_size;
+       long rc;
+
+       rc = riscv_hwprobe(&pair, 1, sizeof(cpu_set_t), (unsigned long *)cpus, 
0);
+       block_size = pair.value;
+       ksft_test_result(rc == 0 && pair.key == 
RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_ZICBOM_BLOCK_SIZE &&
+                        is_power_of_2(block_size), "Zicbom block size\n");
+       ksft_print_msg("Zicbom block size: %llu\n", block_size);
+
+       illegal_insn = false;
+       cbo_clean(&mem[block_size]);
+       ksft_test_result(!illegal_insn, "cbo.clean\n");
+
+       illegal_insn = false;
+       cbo_flush(&mem[block_size]);
+       ksft_test_result(!illegal_insn, "cbo.flush\n");
+}
+
 static void test_zicboz(void *arg)
 {
        struct riscv_hwprobe pair = {
@@ -129,7 +153,7 @@ static void test_zicboz(void *arg)
        ksft_test_result_pass("cbo.zero check\n");
 }
 
-static void check_no_zicboz_cpus(cpu_set_t *cpus)
+static void check_no_zicbo_cpus(cpu_set_t *cpus, __u64 cbo)
 {
        struct riscv_hwprobe pair = {
                .key = RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_IMA_EXT_0,
@@ -137,6 +161,7 @@ static void check_no_zicboz_cpus(cpu_set_t *cpus)
        cpu_set_t one_cpu;
        int i = 0, c = 0;
        long rc;
+       char *cbostr;
 
        while (i++ < CPU_COUNT(cpus)) {
                while (!CPU_ISSET(c, cpus))
@@ -148,10 +173,13 @@ static void check_no_zicboz_cpus(cpu_set_t *cpus)
                rc = riscv_hwprobe(&pair, 1, sizeof(cpu_set_t), (unsigned long 
*)&one_cpu, 0);
                assert(rc == 0 && pair.key == RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_IMA_EXT_0);
 
-               if (pair.value & RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZICBOZ)
-                       ksft_exit_fail_msg("Zicboz is only present on a subset 
of harts.\n"
-                                          "Use taskset to select a set of 
harts where Zicboz\n"
-                                          "presence (present or not) is 
consistent for each hart\n");
+               cbostr = cbo == RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZICBOZ ? "Zicboz" : "Zicbom";
+
+               if (pair.value & cbo)
+                       ksft_exit_fail_msg("%s is only present on a subset of 
harts.\n"
+                                          "Use taskset to select a set of 
harts where %s\n"
+                                          "presence (present or not) is 
consistent for each hart\n",
+                                          cbostr, cbostr);
                ++c;
        }
 }
@@ -159,6 +187,7 @@ static void check_no_zicboz_cpus(cpu_set_t *cpus)
 enum {
        TEST_ZICBOZ,
        TEST_NO_ZICBOZ,
+       TEST_ZICBOM,
        TEST_NO_ZICBOM,
 };
 
@@ -169,6 +198,7 @@ static struct test_info {
 } tests[] = {
        [TEST_ZICBOZ]           = { .nr_tests = 3, test_zicboz },
        [TEST_NO_ZICBOZ]        = { .nr_tests = 1, test_no_zicboz },
+       [TEST_ZICBOM]           = { .nr_tests = 3, test_zicbom },
        [TEST_NO_ZICBOM]        = { .nr_tests = 3, test_no_zicbom },
 };
 
@@ -206,7 +236,14 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
                tests[TEST_ZICBOZ].enabled = true;
                tests[TEST_NO_ZICBOZ].enabled = false;
        } else {
-               check_no_zicboz_cpus(&cpus);
+               check_no_zicbo_cpus(&cpus, RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZICBOZ);
+       }
+
+       if (pair.value & RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZICBOM) {
+               tests[TEST_ZICBOM].enabled = true;
+               tests[TEST_NO_ZICBOM].enabled = false;
+       } else {
+               check_no_zicbo_cpus(&cpus, RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZICBOM);
        }
 
        for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); ++i)
-- 
2.39.2


Reply via email to