Test contended "wait-for-all" waits, to make sure that scheduling and wakeup
logic works correctly, and that the wait only exits once objects are all
simultaneously signaled.

Signed-off-by: Elizabeth Figura <zfig...@codeweavers.com>
---
 .../testing/selftests/drivers/ntsync/ntsync.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 91 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/ntsync/ntsync.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/ntsync/ntsync.c
index ad3f031c0b92..6bf0f10679d8 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/ntsync/ntsync.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/ntsync/ntsync.c
@@ -675,4 +675,95 @@ TEST(wake_any)
        close(fd);
 }
 
+TEST(wake_all)
+{
+       struct ntsync_mutex_args mutex_args = {0};
+       struct ntsync_wait_args wait_args = {0};
+       struct ntsync_sem_args sem_args = {0};
+       struct wait_args thread_args;
+       int objs[2], fd, ret;
+       __u32 count, index;
+       pthread_t thread;
+
+       fd = open("/dev/ntsync", O_CLOEXEC | O_RDONLY);
+       ASSERT_LE(0, fd);
+
+       sem_args.count = 0;
+       sem_args.max = 3;
+       objs[0] = ioctl(fd, NTSYNC_IOC_CREATE_SEM, &sem_args);
+       EXPECT_LE(0, objs[0]);
+
+       mutex_args.owner = 123;
+       mutex_args.count = 1;
+       objs[1] = ioctl(fd, NTSYNC_IOC_CREATE_MUTEX, &mutex_args);
+       EXPECT_LE(0, objs[1]);
+
+       wait_args.timeout = get_abs_timeout(1000);
+       wait_args.objs = (uintptr_t)objs;
+       wait_args.count = 2;
+       wait_args.owner = 456;
+       thread_args.fd = fd;
+       thread_args.args = &wait_args;
+       thread_args.request = NTSYNC_IOC_WAIT_ALL;
+       ret = pthread_create(&thread, NULL, wait_thread, &thread_args);
+       EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
+
+       ret = wait_for_thread(thread, 100);
+       EXPECT_EQ(ETIMEDOUT, ret);
+
+       count = 1;
+       ret = release_sem(objs[0], &count);
+       EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
+       EXPECT_EQ(0, count);
+
+       ret = pthread_tryjoin_np(thread, NULL);
+       EXPECT_EQ(EBUSY, ret);
+
+       check_sem_state(objs[0], 1, 3);
+
+       ret = wait_any(fd, 1, &objs[0], 123, &index);
+       EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
+       EXPECT_EQ(0, index);
+
+       ret = unlock_mutex(objs[1], 123, &count);
+       EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
+       EXPECT_EQ(1, count);
+
+       ret = pthread_tryjoin_np(thread, NULL);
+       EXPECT_EQ(EBUSY, ret);
+
+       check_mutex_state(objs[1], 0, 0);
+
+       count = 2;
+       ret = release_sem(objs[0], &count);
+       EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
+       EXPECT_EQ(0, count);
+       check_sem_state(objs[0], 1, 3);
+       check_mutex_state(objs[1], 1, 456);
+
+       ret = wait_for_thread(thread, 100);
+       EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
+       EXPECT_EQ(0, thread_args.ret);
+
+       /* delete an object while it's being waited on */
+
+       wait_args.timeout = get_abs_timeout(200);
+       wait_args.owner = 123;
+       ret = pthread_create(&thread, NULL, wait_thread, &thread_args);
+       EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
+
+       ret = wait_for_thread(thread, 100);
+       EXPECT_EQ(ETIMEDOUT, ret);
+
+       close(objs[0]);
+       close(objs[1]);
+
+       ret = wait_for_thread(thread, 200);
+       EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
+       EXPECT_EQ(-1, thread_args.ret);
+       EXPECT_EQ(ETIMEDOUT, thread_args.err);
+
+       close(fd);
+}
+
 TEST_HARNESS_MAIN
-- 
2.45.2


Reply via email to