On 31.10.24 15:56, Eric Farman wrote:
On Fri, 2024-10-25 at 16:14 +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
Let's make it a generic KVM hypercall, allowing other subfunctions to
be more independent of virtio.
While at it, document that unsupported/unimplemented subfunctions result
in a SPECIFICATION exception.

This is a preparation for documenting a new hypercall.
s/hypercall/subfunction/ ?
Indeed, thanks! I assume this can be fixed up when applying, unless I 
have to resend for other reasons.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
---
  Documentation/virt/kvm/s390/s390-diag.rst | 18 +++++++++++-------
  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Eric Farman <far...@linux.ibm.com>

Thanks!

--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb


Reply via email to