On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 11:01:44 -0400 Eric Farman <far...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> > + [subcode] "i" (DIAG500_SC_STOR_LIMIT) > > + : "memory", "1", "2"); > > + if (!storage_limit) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + /* Convert inclusive end to exclusive end */ > > + *max_physmem_end = storage_limit + 1; > > return 0; > > } > > > > > > I like the idea of a defined constant here instead of hardcoded, but maybe it > should be placed > somewhere in include/uapi so that QEMU can pick it up with > update-linux-headers.sh and be in sync > with the kernel, instead of just an equivalent definition in [1] ? > > [1] > https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20241008105455.2302628-8-da...@redhat.com/ I think it is fine to have equivalent definitions. This is more or less an ISA thing we are introducing here. And IMHO it would be fine to have such a definition even if the emulator was supposed to run on an OS that is not Linux and without without KVM. Regards, Halil
