Hi Dmitry,

On 06/06/2024 02:58, Dmitry Safonov via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454...@gmail.com>
> 
> Two reasons:
> 1. It's grown up enough
> 2. In order to not do header spaghetti by including
>    <trace/events/tcp.h>, which is necessary for TCP tracepoints.
> 
> While at it, unexport and make static tcp_inbound_ao_hash().

Thank you for working on this.
 > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  include/net/tcp.h | 78 
> +++----------------------------------------------------
>  net/ipv4/tcp.c    | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/net/tcp.h b/include/net/tcp.h
> index e5427b05129b..2aac11e7e1cc 100644
> --- a/include/net/tcp.h
> +++ b/include/net/tcp.h
> @@ -1863,12 +1863,6 @@ tcp_md5_do_lookup_any_l3index(const struct sock *sk,
>       return __tcp_md5_do_lookup(sk, 0, addr, family, true);
>  }
>  
> -enum skb_drop_reason
> -tcp_inbound_md5_hash(const struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *skb,
> -                  const void *saddr, const void *daddr,
> -                  int family, int l3index, const __u8 *hash_location);
> -
> -
>  #define tcp_twsk_md5_key(twsk)       ((twsk)->tw_md5_key)
>  #else
>  static inline struct tcp_md5sig_key *
> @@ -1885,13 +1879,6 @@ tcp_md5_do_lookup_any_l3index(const struct sock *sk,
>       return NULL;
>  }
>  
> -static inline enum skb_drop_reason
> -tcp_inbound_md5_hash(const struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *skb,
> -                  const void *saddr, const void *daddr,
> -                  int family, int l3index, const __u8 *hash_location)
> -{
> -     return SKB_NOT_DROPPED_YET;
> -}

It looks like this no-op is still needed, please see below.

>  #define tcp_twsk_md5_key(twsk)       NULL
>  #endif
>  

(...)

> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> index fa43aaacd92b..80ed5c099f11 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> @@ -4456,7 +4456,7 @@ int tcp_md5_hash_key(struct tcp_sigpool *hp,
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcp_md5_hash_key);
>  
>  /* Called with rcu_read_lock() */
> -enum skb_drop_reason
> +static enum skb_drop_reason
>  tcp_inbound_md5_hash(const struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *skb,
>                    const void *saddr, const void *daddr,
>                    int family, int l3index, const __u8 *hash_location)
> @@ -4510,10 +4510,72 @@ tcp_inbound_md5_hash(const struct sock *sk, const 
> struct sk_buff *skb,
>       }
>       return SKB_NOT_DROPPED_YET;
>  }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcp_inbound_md5_hash);
>  
>  #endif
>  
> +/* Called with rcu_read_lock() */
> +enum skb_drop_reason
> +tcp_inbound_hash(struct sock *sk, const struct request_sock *req,
> +              const struct sk_buff *skb,
> +              const void *saddr, const void *daddr,
> +              int family, int dif, int sdif)
> +{
> +     const struct tcphdr *th = tcp_hdr(skb);
> +     const struct tcp_ao_hdr *aoh;
> +     const __u8 *md5_location;
> +     int l3index;
> +
> +     /* Invalid option or two times meet any of auth options */
> +     if (tcp_parse_auth_options(th, &md5_location, &aoh)) {
> +             tcp_hash_fail("TCP segment has incorrect auth options set",
> +                           family, skb, "");
> +             return SKB_DROP_REASON_TCP_AUTH_HDR;
> +     }
> +
> +     if (req) {
> +             if (tcp_rsk_used_ao(req) != !!aoh) {
> +                     NET_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_TCPAOBAD);
> +                     tcp_hash_fail("TCP connection can't start/end using 
> TCP-AO",
> +                                   family, skb, "%s",
> +                                   !aoh ? "missing AO" : "AO signed");
> +                     return SKB_DROP_REASON_TCP_AOFAILURE;
> +             }
> +     }
> +
> +     /* sdif set, means packet ingressed via a device
> +      * in an L3 domain and dif is set to the l3mdev
> +      */
> +     l3index = sdif ? dif : 0;
> +
> +     /* Fast path: unsigned segments */
> +     if (likely(!md5_location && !aoh)) {
> +             /* Drop if there's TCP-MD5 or TCP-AO key with any rcvid/sndid
> +              * for the remote peer. On TCP-AO established connection
> +              * the last key is impossible to remove, so there's
> +              * always at least one current_key.
> +              */
> +             if (tcp_ao_required(sk, saddr, family, l3index, true)) {
> +                     tcp_hash_fail("AO hash is required, but not found",
> +                                   family, skb, "L3 index %d", l3index);
> +                     return SKB_DROP_REASON_TCP_AONOTFOUND;
> +             }
> +             if (unlikely(tcp_md5_do_lookup(sk, l3index, saddr, family))) {
> +                     NET_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_TCPMD5NOTFOUND);
> +                     tcp_hash_fail("MD5 Hash not found",
> +                                   family, skb, "L3 index %d", l3index);
> +                     return SKB_DROP_REASON_TCP_MD5NOTFOUND;
> +             }
> +             return SKB_NOT_DROPPED_YET;
> +     }
> +
> +     if (aoh)
> +             return tcp_inbound_ao_hash(sk, skb, family, req, l3index, aoh);
> +
> +     return tcp_inbound_md5_hash(sk, skb, saddr, daddr, family,
> +                                 l3index, md5_location);

Many selftests are currently failing [1] because of this line: if
CONFIG_TCP_MD5SIG is not defined -- which is currently the case in many
selftests: tc, mptcp, forwarding, netfilter, drivers, etc. -- then this
tcp_inbound_md5_hash() function is not defined:

> net/ipv4/tcp.c: In function ‘tcp_inbound_hash’:
> net/ipv4/tcp.c:4570:16: error: implicit declaration of function 
> ‘tcp_inbound_md5_hash’; did you mean ‘tcp_inbound_ao_hash’? 
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>  4570 |         return tcp_inbound_md5_hash(sk, skb, saddr, daddr, family,
>       |                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>       |                tcp_inbound_ao_hash

Do you (or any maintainers) mind replying to this email with this line
[2] so future builds from the CI will no longer pick-up this series?

pw-bot: changes-requested

[1]
https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/contest.html?pw-n=0&branch=net-next-2024-06-06--06-00&test=build
[2]
https://docs.kernel.org/process/maintainer-netdev.html#updating-patch-status

Cheers,
Matt
-- 
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.


Reply via email to