On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 11:35:11 -0700 (PDT) Paul Walmsley <paul.walms...@sifive.com> wrote:
> This was simply due to idiocy on my part, due to a very last-minute patch > submission, where I missed that the original documented magic number was > already in little-endian format. The updated number from Chester is > correct. > > So, > > Reviewed-by: Paul Walmsley <paul.walms...@sifive.com> Great, patch applied, thanks. jon
