From: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com>
David Laight explains:
| A long time ago there was a document from Intel that said that
| inb/outb weren't necessarily synchronised wrt memory accesses.
| (Might be P-pro era). However no processors actually behaved that
| way and more recent docs say that inb/outb are fully ordered.
This also reflects the situation on other architectures, the the port
accessor macros tend to be implemented in terms of readX/writeX.
Update Documentation/memory-barriers.txt to reflect reality.
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
Cc: David Laight <david.lai...@aculab.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <st...@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
Cc: <linux-a...@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.ibm.com>
---
Documentation/memory-barriers.txt | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
index 1c22b21ae922..a70104e2a087 100644
--- a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
+++ b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
@@ -2619,10 +2619,8 @@ functions:
intermediary bridges (such as the PCI host bridge) may not fully honour
that.
- They are guaranteed to be fully ordered with respect to each other.
-
- They are not guaranteed to be fully ordered with respect to other types of
- memory and I/O operation.
+ They are guaranteed to be fully ordered with respect to each other and
+ also with respect to other types of memory and I/O operation.
(*) readX(), writeX():
--
2.17.1
