Boris, > -----Original Message----- > From: Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de> > Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2018 3:42 AM > To: Moger, Babu <babu.mo...@amd.com> > Cc: t...@linutronix.de; mi...@redhat.com; cor...@lwn.net; > fenghua...@intel.com; reinette.cha...@intel.com; pet...@infradead.org; > gre...@linuxfoundation.org; da...@davemloft.net; akpm@linux- > foundation.org; h...@zytor.com; x...@kernel.org; > mchehab+sams...@kernel.org; a...@arndb.de; > kstew...@linuxfoundation.org; pombreda...@nexb.com; > raf...@kernel.org; kirill.shute...@linux.intel.com; tony.l...@intel.com; > qianyue...@alibaba-inc.com; xiaochen.s...@intel.com; > pbonz...@redhat.com; Singh, Brijesh <brijesh.si...@amd.com>; Hurwitz, > Sherry <sherry.hurw...@amd.com>; dw...@infradead.org; Lendacky, > Thomas <thomas.lenda...@amd.com>; l...@kernel.org; j...@8bytes.org; > ja...@google.com; vkuzn...@redhat.com; r...@alum.mit.edu; > jpoim...@redhat.com; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux- > d...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 05/13] arch/resctrl: Rename config parameter > INTEL_RDT to RESCTRL > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 08:54:30PM +0000, Moger, Babu wrote: > > Now Resource control feature is supported by both Intel and AMD. > > Rename the INTEL_RDT to vendor neutral RESCTRL. > > > > Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.mo...@amd.com> > > --- > > arch/x86/Kconfig | 4 ++-- > > arch/x86/include/asm/resctrl_sched.h | 4 ++-- > > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile | 4 ++-- > > include/linux/sched.h | 2 +- > > 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig > > index 1a0be022f91d..4aae7aba4d61 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig > > +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig > > @@ -445,8 +445,8 @@ config RETPOLINE > > code are eliminated. Since this includes the syscall entry path, > > it is not entirely pointless. > > > > -config INTEL_RDT > > - bool "Intel Resource Director Technology support" > > +config RESCTRL > > + bool "Resource Control feature support" > > s/feature // - they're all features. :)
Ok sure > > > default n > > depends on X86 && CPU_SUP_INTEL > > Patch 9/13 is begging to be merged with this one. Ok. I will merge these changes in patch 9/13. > > -- > Regards/Gruss, > Boris. > > Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
