In the Function documentation Section of kernel-doc.rst
there is a function_name() function as an example for
how to make a comment about a function.
But at the end of that example there is a reference to foobar
instead of function_name.
I think that should rather be function_name, because that
was the placeholder the whole example was using.
Signed-off-by: Joris Gutjahr <joris.gutj...@gmail.com>
---
Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst
b/Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst
index 8db53cdc225f..51be62aa4385 100644
--- a/Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst
+++ b/Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ The general format of a function and function-like macro
kernel-doc comment is::
* Context: Describes whether the function can sleep, what locks it takes,
* releases, or expects to be held. It can extend over multiple
* lines.
- * Return: Describe the return value of foobar.
+ * Return: Describe the return value of function_name.
*
* The return value description can also have multiple paragraphs, and should
* be placed at the end of the comment block.
--
2.19.1
